Running

Palin's critics (I'm using the nice word) continue to claim she doesn't have sufficient experience to be vice president, even though she has run her own business, a town, and a state very successfully. Why don't they examine and criticize Obama's executive experience? Because he DOESN'T HAVE ANY. None. Zilch. The only running he has done is running for office, usually unopposed. And yet they're trying to make him the most powerful man in the world. Can someone show me their logic? Because I don't see any.